DEVELOP CORPORATE BOND
MARKET STEADILY, OPTIMIZE FINANCIAL ASSET STRUCTURE
by Wu Xiaoling, Deputy
Governor, the PeopleÕs Bank of China
China's existing financial structure is not conducive to the
adjustment of market structure and adds to the economic operation cost
While
China's financial market has developed over the past few years, its financial
asset structure is still characterized by two distinctive features: first, an
excessively high ratio of indirect financing and slow development of direct
financing; second, an overly high percentage of government bonds in direct
financing and the over many resources controlled by the government.
The
backwardness of direct finance situation in China, on the one hand, results in
enormous amounts of idle money in want of direct investment channels. On the
other hand, when enterprises face changes in product and fund supply they are
unable to choose favorable financing strategies to cut financing costs and
adjust production, thus increasing the NPLs in banks and adding to the fiscal
burden on governments at various levels. In this way, risks which should have
been shouldered by market players in the market economy development are now
borne by banks and governments, pumping up the social cost of economic
operation.
Nurturing
direct finance will require improving the corporate bond market. Developing the
corporate bond market, improving financial asset structure, and boosting the
overall progress of China's financial market are all important topics on the
agenda.
Responsibilities to shoulder risks should be clarified and
institutional investors must be fostered
To
facilitate the development of corporate bonds, first of all, responsibilities
to shoulder risks should be clarified. By investing in an enterprise through
bond purchasing, investors have the right to the principal and interest after
an appointed period, and, in the meantime, they should take on the risk of the
enterprise's default and indebtedness. This important principle, however, is
not reflected in China's existing laws or regulations. The administrative rules
for issuing corporate bonds currently demands a compulsory guarantee, which in most
cases is made by state-owned banks. As a result, revisions should be made to
current administrative rules governing corporate bonds and compulsory guarantee
requirement must be cancelled.
Secondly,
the corporate bond market would benefit by nurturing institutional investors.
Investing in corporate bonds requires investors to collect and process enormous
amounts of information, thus creating a high demand for investors' risk
identification; at the same time, the comparatively small movement in bond prices
means that only bulk buying can cut costs effectively. This indicates that only
those institutional investors with the power to identify and shoulder risks are
the ideal investors in corporate bonds. Therefore, it would be beneficial to
cultivate institutional investors such as insurance companies, commercial
banks, pension funds, and investment funds.
Thirdly,
to develop China's corporate bond market, we should learn lessons from past
experience in market management and construction. There are a few reasons for
the lag in China's corporate bond market development. The current administration of corporate bond issuance
imposes too many restrictions. With heavy governmental intervention, the system
of examination and approval has made corporate bonds a tool used by local
governments to support local economies and complement inadequate loans. This greatly increases the default risk
of corporate bonds. Furthermore,
as the main body of corporate bond buyers, individual investors cannot match
the risk level of corporate bonds.
Finally, the market lacks a sound rating and information disclosure
system. Stricter issuance restrictions are imposed on the administration of
corporate bond without appropriately learning from the historical experience
and lessons. The existing corporate bond issuance administration aims for zero
risk, for the authority is concerned about potential social instability
resulting from corporate bond defaults.
Intermediary organizations should be fostered and financial
services should be improved
First,
an effective credit rating system and strict information disclosure system
should be set up for corporate bonds, and rating agencies should be encouraged.
Second, supervision should follow the demands of corporate bond trading,
allowing market players to choose market and trading patterns. Based on that,
efforts should be made to improve market management, gradually loosen
restrictions on the market, and set up effective incentive mechanisms, thus
giving full play to intermediaries and other participants. Third, improvement
must be made in bond custody and settlement, so as to raise the efficiency of
bond trading. For instance, the current custody mode for bonds and clients'
funds must be thoroughly reformed for it cannot technically ensure that
clients' assets or funds will not be misappropriated.
Supervision coordination should be strengthened and functional
supervision should be established
To
begin with, it should be clarified that bond market supervision should
concentrate on functional supervision, and that the establishment of
operational rules, market access, and daily supervision in the bond market
should fall under the corresponding market supervision departments, in order to
avoid both overlap and oversight. The supervisory should be oriented towards
the establishment of rules for bond issuing and trading, as well as the setting
and execution of the system of information disclosure and credit rating. On
this premise, limitations should be lifted concerning issuers' qualification,
issuing quota and interest rate; while corporate bond issuance should follow
the verification system, and then realize the registration issuance management
as soon as possible. Also, a mechanism must be set up to coordinate supervision
and raise supervisory efficiency. The coordination among supervisory
departments is embodied by unification of supervisory notions and rules, and
information sharing.